Funding
and inertia are always the weak spots for government organizations. The board
of education is no different. There are many competing interests that require
funding, however, the overarching interest should, and for me will be, what is
in the best interest of the children. We must provide them the education that
prepares them for the practical aspects of life and work.
For
the inertia issue, I note a positive characteristic of the Hall County school
system is a recognition that change is necessary and a willingness to adapt to
that change. As the state school system
undergoes the sea change from the restrictive, narrowly focused process
unfortunately inate in the No Child Left behind system to the College and
Career Readiness Performance Index (CCRPI) model that can more finely focus
resources to the most critical areas needing improvement, the system will have
to adapt. It will take an academic knowledge base and experience in rapidly
moving, large scale management in the school board to both nudge the inertial
elements that may hold us back from providing the world class education our
children deserve and guiding the implementation of that system.
For
the funding issue, there is strong political pressure to avoid increasing
taxes. With $27 million less in funds available than there were several years
ago, yet more students to serve, the fact that adequate services are provided
is remarkable. Those same cost conscious efforts that privatized for economies
and reduced costs elsewhere must needs be continued. However, the reduction in
people resources brought about by deferment of hires, lay-offs, the mini-layoff
we call furloughs, and increased class sizes will soon extract a heavy toll on
performance. Grants, bonds, SPLOSTs, and other such methods of secondary
financing will have to be sought and continued. In addition, the economies
learned through the charter school experiments will have to be adopted and
adapted to the remainder of the public school system where feasible.
The
shortfalls in state funding have put an extra burden on the citizens of Hall
County through increased millage rates. At the same time, the school district
has begun to get in the habit of "economize where wise." I would like
to see that continue and those skills be honed. Therefore, I believe we need to
use the majority of "rebound windfall" to first reduce the tax burden
on the citizens. Using the rest will require a well thought out prioritization
after a cogent strategic plan is developed.
I believe a clear vision and a cogent strategic plan
that leads to that vision are lacking. I know some may disagree with that, but
if you’ve never done it, how can you know? I have done it in organizations big
and small and seen them succeed beyond their aspirations. We can achieve that
high degree of successful plan in our system. These need to be the product of
the Board, the staff, the faculty, the parents, and, yes, the students. They
must also be readily visible to all of these stake holders at all times,
frequently revisited, and used as a basis for planning and decision making
throughout the system